Eugenics timeline

Eugenics and genocide have been bedfellows since the beginning of time. I recently discovered a nice timeline that was put together by the Museum of disAbility which highlights the use of eugenics thoughout history.

Our own history of genocide

While I was working with a client yesterday, I found myself in the middle of a discussion about the repetitive nature of genocide. How it continues to happen regardless of how much time and energy we spend educating people about the last atrocity.

In a sense, a large part of this pattern has to do with our own histories of genocide. It’s difficult to support international laws that would aggressively prosecute war criminals and genocidaires when our own government is guilty of the same. Even as Canada begins prosecuting the first war criminal under its new genocide laws, the Globe and Mail reports on a new documentary entitled Unrepentant: Kevin Annett and Canada’s Genocide, detailing the country’s policies of dealing with native peoples.

As many as half of the aboriginal children who attended the early years of residential schools died of tuberculosis, despite repeated warnings to the federal government that overcrowding, poor sanitation and a lack of medical care were creating a toxic breeding ground for the rapid spread of the disease, documents show.

A Globe and Mail examination of documents in the National Archives reveals that children continued to die from tuberculosis at alarming rates for at least four decades after a senior official at the Department of Indian Affairs initially warned in 1907 that schools were making no effort to separate healthy children from those sick with the highly contagious disease.

Peter Bryce, the department’s chief medical officer, visited 15 Western Canadian residential schools and found at least 24 per cent of students had died from tuberculosis over a 14-year period. The report suggested the numbers could be higher, noting that in one school alone, the death toll reached 69 per cent.

With less than four months to go before Ottawa officially settles out of court with most former students, a group calling itself the Friends and Relatives of the Disappeared Residential School Children is urging the government to acknowledge this period in the tragic residential-schools saga – and not just the better-known cases of physical and sexual abuse.

The same is true of the United States. Even as the Commonwealth of Virginia (my current home) prepared for the Jamestown Anniversary, Native American tribes decided to use it as an opportunity to protest the government’s policy of denying them tribal status.

Despite the well documented history of nearly 400 tribes in the Virginia area, not a single group has the luxury of sovereign status. The effect? It’s creating a “paper genocide” for members of Virginia’s tribes.

Which begs the question, where are the student protest groups lining DC to demand Native American rights? It’s difficult to claim that we’re outraged by our government’s lack of response to Darfur, while at the same time ignoring what’s been happening at home.

I suppose it’s the same reason that scandals sell newspapers. When genocide happens in a far off country it’s somehow viewed through the lens of a romanticized call-to-action, whereas the one that took place here, and continues to edge forward by small degrees, is rather dirty and unpleasant.

Sudan bombs Darfur village

True to form, even as Sudan has tentatively agreed to allow 3000 UN troops to reinforce AU peacekeepers, the government has apparently bombed a village in north Darfur.

Ibrahim al-Helu, a commander in the Sudan Liberation Army rebel faction, said the air strike totally destroyed the village of Jemmeiza.

“There are casualties but darkness is making it difficult to reach them or know their number,” he told Reuters by telephone.

“A lot of civilians have fled the village. Some have gone missing,” he said.

The Sudanese government continues to deny any involvement in the ongoing violence.

Tighter sanctions for Sudan

Yesterday, President Bush told Sudan that he was ready to tighten economic sanctions as well as impose new ones in order to bring the violence in Darfur to a stop. This ramped up rhetoric comes as Sudan has agreed to accept 3000 peacekeeping forces to bolster the beleaguered and under-funded AU mission that is currently operating in the region.

With the US presidential campaigns filling the media, it wasn’t surprising to see that Barack Obama issued the following press release in response to Bush’s statements:

“President Bush may have spoken with passion about the genocide in Darfur, but his actions — while stronger than those of many other nations – once again fall far short of what is urgently needed to stop the senseless slaughter of innocents.”

“The measures announced by President Bush, combined with the only sporadic engagement of U.S. diplomats in this crisis, will only reinforce Khartoum’s perception that the U.S. is unwilling to take tough action to halt the genocide, and allow the Sudanese government additional opportunities to delay the arrival of UN forces to support the over-burdened African Union mission. Tough sanctions and holding perpetrators of genocide accountable for their actions are essential to influence Sudanese behavior.”

“The crisis in Sudan and the situation in the sub-region continues to worsen by the day. The recent announcement by the Government of Sudan that it will finally accept 3,000 UN peacekeepers is insufficient to stop the killing. It is time for the Administration and the international community to take long-overdue steps to ensure that Khartoum allows the immediate and unconditional deployment of a robust international force with a clear mandate to protect civilians and stop the slaughter.”

Even though I enjoy hearing Obama’s compassionate outcry over the violence, I can’t help but note that our entire government (Senate, House, and Executive) has failed to properly react to this situation. As has been the case in every previous genocide.

Yom HaShoah sacrifice

As the country watched the massacre at Virginia Tech unfold yesterday, the Jewish world was observing a holiday — the Holocaust Martyrs’ Remembrance Day (Yom HaShoah). It’s an occasion to remember those who died during the Holocaust. Ironically, a survivor was one of the victims:

As Jews worldwide honored on Monday the memory of those who were murdered in the Holocaust, a 75-year-old survivor sacrificed his life to save his students in Monday’s shooting at Virginia Tech College that left 32 dead and over two dozen wounded.

Professor Liviu Librescu, 76, threw himself in front of the shooter, who had attempted to enter his classroom. The Israeli mechanics and engineering lecturer was shot to death, “but all the students lived – because of him,” Virginia Tech student Asael Arad – also an Israeli – told Army Radio.

Several of Librescu’s other students sent e-mails to his wife, Marlena, telling of how he blocked the gunman’s way and saved their lives, said the son, Joe.

“My father blocked the doorway with his body and asked the students to flee,” Joe Librescu said in a telephone interview from his home outside of Tel Aviv. “Students started opening windows and jumping out.”